The article is devoted to the problem of accidental environmental pollution management during the operation of water transport objects. The most common example of such type of pollution is an spill of oil or petroleum products. The solution to the problem of environmental protection in case of emergency oil spills is character- ized by the presence of certain experience. However, this experience is more relevant to the elimination of spills. At the same time, as shown in the work, effective protection against accidental environmental pollution, including in case of oil spills, is provided by regulating accidental pollution. In the article the components of the process of regulation of accidental environmental pollution are formed. It is proposed to characterize the pollution of the environment using the risk parameter. The application of the concept of risk as a parameter that characterizes both the probability of accidental spills and severity of such spills, which is characterized by the amount of oil entering the environment, is justified. This understanding of the risk parameter of accidental pollution allowed the authors to form the main directions of the organization of activities to protect the environment from the pollution. It is shown that the main directions of protective measures are measures to prevent the occurrence of an emergency spill and measures to eliminate it. The formation of a set of protective measures is based on the analysis of the possible risk of pollution for the technical object under study. The paper describes the algorithm of such analysis. The typification of all technical devices that are used to move oil on the investigated technical object is proposed, which allows to unify protective measures and effectively apply them. A General approach to the establishment of acceptable values of the probability of accidental pollution and its severity is formulated, as well as their boundaries are defined.
accidental pollution, regulation, risk, probability , damage, risk assessment algorithm, preventive protection, active protection
1. Kurnikov, A. S. Koncepciya povysheniya ekologicheskoy bezopasnosti sudna / A. S. Kurnikov,- N. Novgorod.: Izd-vo VGAVT, 2002. - 80 s.
2. Reshnyak V.I. Sistema upravleniya ekologicheskoy bezopasnost'yu pri ekspluatacii sudov na vnutrennih vodnyh putyah,- SPb.: Izd-vo GUMRF im. adm. S O. Makarova, 2017 - 140 s.
3. Naumov B.C. Predotvraschenie zagryazneniya okruzha yuschey sredy na vnutrennem vodnom transporte upravleniem antropogennoy nagruzkoy: diss.. doktora tehn. nauk.- Nizhniy Novgorod, 2003.321s.
4. Plastinin A.E., Nauchnye osnovy prognozirova niya m analiza ekologicheskih posledstviy razlivov nefti na vnutrennih vodnyh putyah, dis.. doktora, tehn. nauk.- Nizhn. Novgorod, 2016.
5. Etan V.L., Cheban E.Yu., Ivanov V.M., Vas'kin S.V., Lukina E.A., Sosenkov F.S., Organizaciya bor'by s razlivami nefti na vnutrennih vodnyh putyah.- Nizhniy Novgorod: Izdatel'stvo FGBOU VO «VGUVT», 2015,- 284 s.
6. Reshnyak V. Inland waterway environmental safety /Reshnyak V., Sokolov S.,Nyrkov A., Budnik V.//International Conference Infonnation Technologies in Business and Industry. - 2018. - YuR Publishing, IOP Conf. Series: Journal of Physics: Conf. Series 1015.
7. Reshnyak V.I., Opyt organizacii i ispol'zovaniya tehnicheskih sredstv dnya likvidacii avariynyh razlivov nefti / V.I. Reshnyak // Vestnik Gosudarstvennogo universiteta morskogo i rechnogo flota imeni admirala S. O. Makarova. - 2018. - T. 10,- №2.-S. 287-299.
8. Turkin, V.A. Ekologicheskaya bezopasnost' i ee mera - risk: aspekty teorii i praktiki / Turkin V.A., Chur» N.N. //Bezopasnost' v tehnosfere. -2007 -№2 - S. 11-16.
9. Tihomirov N.P. Metody analiza i upravleniya ekologo-ekonomicheskimi riskami.- M.: YuNITI-DANA. 2003,- 350 s.
10. Garcia-Onetti, J. Integrated and ecosystemic approaches for bridging the gap between environmental management and port management/Garcia-Onetti, J., Scherer, M. E. G., Barragan, J. M. //Journal of environmental management. - 2018. - T. 206. - p. 615624.
11. Kozar L. Zarqdzanie ryzykiem srodowiskowym w przedsztjbiorstwie jako kierunek wspierania budowy zielonej gospodarki / Kozar L.// Research Papers of the Wroclaw University of Economics / Prace Naukowe IJniwersytetu F.konomicznego we Wroclawiu. 2017, Issue 470, p. 62-74.
12. Fedorec A G. Koncepciya riska v zhizni i deya tel'nosti cheloveka /Fedorec A.G.// Zh-l «Bezopasnost' v tehnosfere». - 2013,- T. 2. - №1. -S. 3-13.
13. Metodika opredeleniya raschetnyh velichin pozharnogo riska v zdaniyah, sooruzheniyah i pozharnyh otsekah razlichnyh klassov funkcionashnoy pozharnoy opasnosti, prikaz MChS ot 30.06.2009 g. № 382 "Ob utverzhdenii metodiki opredeleniya raschetnyh velichin pozharnogo riska v zdaniyah, sooruzheniyah i stroeniyah razlichnyh klassov funkcional'noy pozharnoy opasnosti" (s izmeneniyami i dopolneniyami). Sistema GARANT: http: //base. garant. ru/12169057/# ixzzS aQsl2 w YC.
14. Borodin E.L., Bidenko S.I., Travin S.V., Hekert E.V., Hramov I.S.Geoinformacionnaya podderzhka upravleniya morskoy transportnoy aktivnost'yu: metodicheskiy aspekt// Ekspluataciya morskogo transporta-2018 -№2 (87).-S. 80-84.
15. Karakaev A.B., Lukanin A.V., Hekert E.V. Osnovnye principy modelirovaniya i informacionnoy podderzhki processov upravleniya ekspluataciey sudovyh elektroenergeticheskih sistem, (chast' 1) //Ekspluataciya morskogo transporta -2017,- №2 (83).- S. 114-122.
